FOLLOW THE FREE – New Rules https://kk.org/newrules Just another kk.org site Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:21:12 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.12 Pinpoint where value is being given out… https://kk.org/newrules/pinpoint_where_value_is_being/ https://kk.org/newrules/pinpoint_where_value_is_being/#comments Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:21:12 +0000 Continue reading ]]> …for free now, and then follow up. The next netscape, the next yahoo, the next microsoft is already up and running, and they are giving their stuff away for free. Find them, and hitch your wagon to their star. Look for the following tricks: charges only for ancillaries, as-if-free behavior, memberships, and outright generosity. If they are using the free to play off network effects, they are the real mccoys.

]]>
https://kk.org/newrules/pinpoint_where_value_is_being/feed/ 1
The ancillary market is the market. https://kk.org/newrules/the_ancillary_market_is_the_ma/ Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:50:54 +0000 Continue reading ]]> The software is free, but the manual is $10,000. That’s no joke. Cygnus Solutions, based in Sunnyvale, California, rakes in $20 million per year in revenues selling support for free Unix-like software. Apache is free but you can buy support and upgrades from C2Net. Although Novell, the network provider, does sell network software, that’s not what they are really selling, says Esther Dyson: “What Novell Inc. really is selling is its certified NetWare engineers, instructors, and administrators, and the next release of NetWare.” One educational software exec admitted that his company’s help line was actually an important profit center. Their main market was the ancillary products they sold for their flagship software, which they had a chance to do while helping customers.

]]>
Turn off the meter, charge for joining. https://kk.org/newrules/turn_off_the_meter_charge_for/ https://kk.org/newrules/turn_off_the_meter_charge_for/#comments Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:06:29 +0000 Continue reading ]]> Flat or monthly fixed pricing is one way of pricing “as if free.” Fees are paid, but there is no meter running. This tactic can be abused by the company (a la cable TV) or can be abused by the consumer (a la AOL). A flat fee is one type of subscription. Subscriptions are well-honed tools used by the soft world of magazines and theater, among others. Could subscriptions really apply to old order physical products, like say, food? The idea of subscribing to food is not so outlandish. Forty years ago subscriptions to milk were quite common. There were also subscriptions to bread and beer and other staples. Subscriptions tend to emphasize and charge for intangible values: regularity, reliability, first to be served, and authenticity, and work well in the arena of “as if free.”

]]>
https://kk.org/newrules/turn_off_the_meter_charge_for/feed/ 4
Anticipate the cheap. https://kk.org/newrules/anticipate_the_cheap/ Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:22:36 +0000 What would you do if your current offerings cost only one third what they cost today? They will someday soon, so create models that recognize this trend.

]]>
Invest in the first copy. https://kk.org/newrules/invest_in_the_first_copy/ https://kk.org/newrules/invest_in_the_first_copy/#comments Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:49:10 +0000 Continue reading ]]> That is the only one that will hurt. The second copy and all thereafter will head toward the free, but the first will become increasingly more expensive and capital intensive. Gordon Moore, of Moore’s Law fame, posed a second law: that the costs of inventing chips (that are halving in cost every 18 months) is doubling every three to four years. The up-front investment for research, design, and process invention for all complex endeavors are commanding a larger share of the budget, while the capital costs of subsequent copies diminishes.

]]>
https://kk.org/newrules/invest_in_the_first_copy/feed/ 1
Act as if your product or service is free. https://kk.org/newrules/act_as_if_your_product_or_serv/ https://kk.org/newrules/act_as_if_your_product_or_serv/#comments Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:10:51 +0000 Continue reading ]]> Magazine publishers do this. The cover price on a magazine barely covers the cost of printing it, so publishers act as if they were giving it away (and some actually do). They make their money instead on advertising. Says pundit Esther Dyson, “The creator who immediately writes off the costs of developing content–as if it were valueless–is always going to win over the creator who can’t figure out how to cover those costs.” Memberships in serious discounters such as Cendant are also “as if free.” Cendant “gives away” the merchandise very near the cost of manufacturing, as if the stuff were free. They make the bulk of their profits not from selling goods to its members–who get fantastic retail prices–but from selling $40 per year membership fees.

]]>
https://kk.org/newrules/act_as_if_your_product_or_serv/feed/ 3
What can you give away? https://kk.org/newrules/what_can_you_give_away/ Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:11:59 +0000 Continue reading ]]> This is the most powerful question in this book. You can approach this question in two ways: What is the closest you can come to making something free, without actually pricing it at zero? Or, in a true gesture of enlightened generosity, you can figure out how to part with something very valuable for no monetary return at all. If either strategy is pursued with intelligence, the result will be the same. The network will magnify the value of the gift. But giving something away is not usually easy. It must be the right gift, given in the proper context. To figure out what to give away, consider these questions:

  • Is the freebie more than a silly premium, like the toy in a cereal box? There is no power in the gift unless it is crucial to your business.
  • What virtuous circle will this freebie circulate in? Is it the loop you most need to amplify?
  • In the long run, the unbounded support of a customer is more valuable than a fixed amount of their money. How will you eventually capture the support of customers if there is initially no flow of money?

Every organization harbors at least one creation–or potential creation–that can be liberated into “freedom.” This is often an idea with problems, particularly with its price: Should it be $69.50 per minute or $6.50 per box? The answer sometimes is: It should be free. Even if the idea is never actualized, my experience is that the very act of contemplating the free will inevitably illuminate all kinds of beneficial attributes that were never visible before. “Free” has long been a taboo price point. Perhaps because it has been forbidden, many low-hanging fruit are waiting to be plucked by giving the free serious consideration.

]]>
Releasing incomplete “buggy” products is not… https://kk.org/newrules/releasing_incomplete_buggy_pro/ https://kk.org/newrules/releasing_incomplete_buggy_pro/#comments Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:27:03 +0000 Continue reading ]]> cost-cutting desperation; it is the shrewdest way to complete a product when your customers are smarter than you are.

The protocommercial state and the triumph of the commons is in ascendance. It is no coincidence that increasing numbers of internet companies take themselves public before they are profitable. Investors are purchasing shares in a firm with protocommercial value. The old guard reads this as a signal of greed, speculation, and hype. But it also signals that many of the components of the gift economy–attention, community, standards, and shared intelligence–have to be in place before cold-cash commercialization can kick in. The gift economy is a rehearsal for the radical dynamics of the network economy.

]]>
https://kk.org/newrules/releasing_incomplete_buggy_pro/feed/ 1
Tens of thousands of software programs… https://kk.org/newrules/tens_of_thousands_of_software/ https://kk.org/newrules/tens_of_thousands_of_software/#comments Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:18:19 +0000 Continue reading ]]> …written for almost every imaginable use are available on the net for free. Called shareware, the model is simple. Download whatever software you want for free, try it out, and if you like it, send some money to the author. Dozens of entrepreneurs have made their million dollars selling goods by this protocommercial method. More and more, the triumph of the commons overrides orthodox business models.

As Stewart Brand says, the main event of the emerging World Wide Web is its current absence of a business model in the midst of astounding abundance. The gift economy is one way players in the net rehearse for a life of following the free and anticipating the cheap. This is also a way for entirely new business models to shake out. Furthermore the protocommercial stage is a way for innovation to fast-forward into hyperdrive. Temporarily unhinged from the constraints of having to make a profit by next quarter, the greater network can explore a universe of never-before-tried ideas. Some ideas will even survive the transplantation to a working business.

It’s a rare (and foolish) software outfit these days that does not introduce its wares into the free economy as a beta version in some fashion. Fifty years ago the notion of releasing a product unfinished–with the intention that the users would help complete it–would have been considered either cowardly, cheap, or inept. But in the new regime, this precommercial stage is brave, prudent, and vital.

]]>
https://kk.org/newrules/tens_of_thousands_of_software/feed/ 1
Talk of generosity… https://kk.org/newrules/talk_of_generosity/ https://kk.org/newrules/talk_of_generosity/#comments Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:10:31 +0000 Continue reading ]]> …of information that wants to be free, and of virtual communities is often dismissed by businesspeople as youthful new age idealism. It may be idealistic but it is also the only sane way to launch a commercial economy in the emerging space. “The web’s lack of an obvious business model right now is actually its main event,” says Stewart Brand, of the Global Business Network.

When a sector of the new economy passes through the protocommercial phase, it is the opposite of the “tragedy of the commons.” The tragedy of the commons was that nobody took responsibility for maintaining the communal pastures that were the livelihood for the entire community. In the follow-the-free economy that seems to precede commercial activity on the net, everyone keeps the commons up because nobody is able to make a living from it on their own. Sophisticated software, as good as anything you can purchase, is written, debugged, supported, and revised for free in this “triumph of the commons.”

The most popular software used to run web sites is called Apache. It is not sold by Netscape, or Microsoft, or anyone. Apache, which has 47% of the server market (Microsoft has 22% and Netscape 10%), was written (and is maintained) by a network of volunteers. It is given away free. Apache, which is used by the developers of such commercial sites as McDonald’s, keeps getting better because the triumph of the commons rewards a completely open product: Anyone has access to Apache’s software source code and can improve it. “If you give everyone source code, everyone becomes your engineer,” says John Gage, chief scientist at Sun Microsystems.

The most popular operating system for web server workstations is not sold by anyone. It is a product called Linux, a Unix-compatible program that was originally written by Linus Torvalds, and given away for free. In the manner of building medieval cathedrals, hundreds of software engineers volunteer their time and expertise to refine and improve Linux, and to keep it free. Beside Apache and Linux, there are many other free software suites, such as Perl and X-Windows, maintained by a network of programmers. The engineers don’t get paid in money; rather they get better tools than they can buy, tools that can be easily tweaked by them for maximum performance, tools superior to what they can make alone, and tools that increase in network value, since they are given away.

]]>
https://kk.org/newrules/talk_of_generosity/feed/ 3