Comments on: The Post-Productive Economy https://kk.org/thetechnium/the-post-produc/ Making the Inevitable Obvious Wed, 06 May 2020 17:46:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.12 By: obarthelemy https://kk.org/thetechnium/the-post-produc/#comment-81832 Tue, 13 Jun 2017 21:06:00 +0000 #comment-81832 Aren’t there other reasons to forgo toilets ? One of the very few things I remember from my very cursory course on China in highschool 40 yrs ago is that small-scale farms used “human fertilizer” (cue 15yo’s giggles)
Has it changed since then ? It sounds like a very reasonable, esp. compared to trying to get rid of it in the absence of sewers.

]]>
By: shelley_ashfield https://kk.org/thetechnium/the-post-produc/#comment-81755 Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:57:00 +0000 #comment-81755 The cost/benefit to Option A or Option B may be entirely dependent on whether you are a man or a woman. As long as you have a wife to carry your water, and haul out your sh-t, you may find it advantageous to opt for the cell phone…

]]>
By: neilcraig https://kk.org/thetechnium/the-post-produc/#comment-81324 Fri, 02 May 2014 19:40:00 +0000 #comment-81324 I believe the overwhelming “headwind” is government regulatory parasitism, of which “environmental” regulation is part. Houses, for example have risen in price about 4 fold over a century. a house and car used to cost the same.

This is not because housebuilding has become more technically complicated and cars haven’t but because the big cost is getting government permission to build – not a problem in hinterland China. This, in turn happens because houses, being big and stationary, are an easy target for state parasites, while cars go where they want. In general we have seen progress in the small and exportable industries – computers, cell phones (they only stated getting cheap when they became mobile), information. They have stayed expensive, or non-existent where they would be large or visible – houses, jet packs, nuclear power plants. Or where we humans are vulnerable to false scare stories & will stand for large government bureaucracies “protecting” us – child care, global warming, nuclear power, medicine (I believe we would have made serious progress in chemically reversing aging by now if medical research didn’t cost $1 bn to approve anything).

Based on housing costs I would say we would all be 4 times better off now without such parasitism. With electricity I can make the case for 50 time (ie 98% of the cost could be cut if we were allowed mass produced modular nuclear reactors with “safety” costs about matching those required in building 747s.

China has far less housing control and electricity costs about 1/4 of the US, which explains their 10% annual growth.

]]>